Showing posts with label People. Show all posts
Showing posts with label People. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

2B1ASK1 taken to a different plane


What if the masonic practice of refusing to ask anyone to be a mason, whether friend, neighbor or passing stranger was applied to other areas of life?

On my other blog, I wrote a lengthy musing on the topic of the right of a child to be able to choose their path for life without pressure from parents to be just like they are.

What if as a parent, you could not even hint at requesting or expecting your child to belong to the same church or other organizations that you do? I wish I knew the answer to that. I personally think less of your children would do what you do, but they would be more dedicated to it. Perhaps about the same as the sons of masons who join the lodge.

What would happen if it were switched around, and your children were all 'forced' to join DeMolay and Job's Daughters? And then when they were older, they were mightily expected to join the Lodge / Eastern Star. What would that do to the Lodge? Is it similar to how your church is currently running?

These are all interesting questions.

oh ... just for the record, I think the 2B1ASK1 thing is dorky :-)

Thursday, March 13, 2008

The Ashlar's Wife

As a follow up to the Broken Ashlar post, what do you do if the wife of a mason, otherwise a great man happens to be ... less than desirable?

Perhaps you all know of a woman who came in and cheated, stole, lied and generally killed off all of the appendant bodies that she was allowed into? If you do not, let me inform you, they do exist!

I would like to exhort all of the existing members of appendant bodies to examine and inquire into the morality and character of the wives of masons (or children) before letting them join. I fear that these organizations are so starved for members that they are willing to lower their standards in order to fill the ranks.

Of course, I have my own opinion on that! I believe that these groups should be open to all woman, girls and boys of good moral standing, regardless of the random chance that they would be related to a mason. If the Lodge is suffering from a lack of new members, these other bodies are doubly so, as they have a much smaller pool to dip from. Many wonderful candidates are being left out in the cold only because of the chance of birth. This seems to be contrary to the stated ideals of universal brotherhood.

Woman Fellowcrafts

Renaissance Adventures recently posed a question about the gender of a couple fellowcrafts [here]. I answered it, and it was reposted on the said blog.

Check it out!

Monday, January 21, 2008

Psst .. So who are YOU going to vote for?

I was at a get-together tonight, and someone I didn't know started talking to me, and they asked me who I was going to vote for - when I told them I didn't like their favorite candidate, and that I would rather vote for _(insert candidate from opposite partisan group here)_, their friendly demeanor turned icy in a heart-beat, and they were off to talk to someone else in less than two seconds. Well! If that's the way they want to be! That got me thinking .. huh, I bet this is why there's that rule about not talking about politics in lodge.

I'm sure the person I was talking to (however briefly) and I would have gotten along quite well enough, but the wedge of politics was driven between us before we could start a decent conversation. Does it really matter who we are going to vote for? Very few people share all the views of any political candidate, and so who they choose to vote for is merely a matter of their impressions and what they have read and what party they belong to. But, even in the party *I* belong to, I totally disagree with some of the candidates (like the one this person was advocating), as well as agree with a few of the candidates in the other camps.

Instead of focusing on dividing ourselves into different groups and viewpoints, we should get together and talk about what should be done to fix our problems. We all agree that there ARE problems, we just disagree about how to fix them. Just remember, no matter what any of the candidates SAY, the only way to change things is through each community.

I always think, when looking through the news during a major election... "wow, I wonder what kind of amazing things could be done with x amount of million dollars that is just being wasted... parks, schools, jobs ..."

Masonry is one place where this community service can start. Of course, anything of that sort needs to involve the whole community before it can really make a difference. Keeping the instant divisions that politics tend to create out of the lodge allows its members to ACT! where none of the political parties will never succeed.

So, next time someone asks you - So who are you voting for? think twice before answering.

Saturday, January 19, 2008

A Broken Ashlar

One of the symbols of freemasonry is that of the rough and perfect ashlar. These represent the unfinished state of both stone and man. After smoothing out rough edges, the stone becomes square and usable for building the temple..

When building the temple, what should be done with stones, whether rough or perfect that crack? They have been broken, they cannot be used for the temple. With operative masonry, that stone would either be thrown to the slag-pile (along with any funny-shaped stones they might find) or be cut into two separate stones, salvaging what may be salvaged.

In the lodge, there is no slag-heap for masons who were admitted, appearing to be suitable stones, and yet crack under pressure, or over time. Yet, what should be done with these men? How do you tell them that they cannot join the line-up because they are bordering on insane, and no one had noticed when they were brought into the fraternity (possibly because everyone had been so excited to finally get a candidate).

This is a very real question, and one that doesn't have a good answer. Of course, candidates should be checked thoroughly before being admitted! The investigative committee should do their job, and the other members should ALL try and meet the incoming member before they are initiated, otherwise, on what grounds are you voting?

But, once that mistake is made (and, it may be made even but the most scrutinizing of committees), what is the course to take? I have seen the problem ignored - the offending brother shuttled from one unimportant position to another to keep him from advancing to a point where he would have been voted on. This brother caused many of the new apprentices to think twice before returning, and drove others away with threats and gossip among other things. Something should have been done, and eventually was in a very messy manner which alienated many more members of this particular lodge.

Unfortunately, I am only pointing out a problem, rather than offering a solution to the problem. But, I feel that once it is recognized that a brother can break, it is possible to address the issue, rather than side-step it.

As I was looking for a good picture for this post, I found these photographs of the process of working with large stones, enjoy!

Acquiring and cutting of the stone
Rough Cutting of the Sculpture
Filling in the details